Best NVMe SSDs: 2025′ Top-5 List

This post includes the best NVMe SSDs among those I’ve reviewed that you can safely bring home today.

These are fast internal solid-state drives designed for computers and game consoles that use PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 bus speeds—they are the fastest consumer-grade internal storage options. If you’re looking for hard drive replacements, consider this post on the top five SATA drives instead.

Dong’s note: I first published this frequently-revised roundup on April 15, 2025, and last updated it on July 2, 2025.

Best NVMe SSDsBest NVMe SSDs
Best NVMe SSDs: Besides the heatsink versions, these internal storage devices are so thin that they are often referred to as “storage sticks.”

Best NVMe SSDs: 2025’s battle-tested list

This list includes the current best NVMe SSDs and their alternatives. It is sorted in recommendation order, with the best options at the top—the numbers indicate the ranking. Scrol down for their performance charts.

Tip

NVMe and SATA are two distinctive internal storage types, with the former being much faster. Currently, the fastest NVMe drives utilize the PCIe 5.0 standard, although PCIe 4.0 and PCIe 3.0 counterparts remain viable options in all cases. All NVMe SSDs can work with motherboards of all PCIe standards, regardless of the revision. Most modern computers come with one or a few M.2 slots to host NVMe SSDs.

The latest drives on this list all feature PCIe Gen 5, but you’ll find many PCIe Gen 4 options among the mentioned alternatives, some of which were previously among the top five.

1. Micron Crucial P510 (PCIe Gen 5×4)

Crucial P510 NVMe SSD topCrucial P510 NVMe SSD top
Best NVMe SSDs: The Crucial P510 is a standard single-sized SSD.

The Crucial P510 is Micron’s third PCIe Gen 5 SSDs, but the first of the standard designed as a mainstream drive. As such, it currently has the best performance-to-cost ratio. That, plus the omission of excessive heat, makes it an excellent deal.

Alternatives:

Pros

Excellent performance; runs relatively cool

Helpful Crucial Storage Executive software

Comparatively affordable, 5-year warranty

Cons

Capacities cap at 2TB (for now)


2. Samsung SSD 990 EVO Plus (PCIe Gen 5×2)

Samsung SSD 990 EVO Plus and retail boxSamsung SSD 990 EVO Plus and retail box
Best NVMe SSDs: The Samsung SSD 990 EVO Plus is a hybrid PCIe Gen 5×2/PCIe Gen 4×4 SSD.

The Samsung SSD 990 EVO Plus is Samsung’s second attempt at PCIe Gen 5. Like the 990 EVO, it operates as a two-lane drive when functioning as a PCIe Gen 5 SSD and as a four-lane drive when operating as a PCIe Gen 4 drive. This approach strikes a balance between delivering the necessary performance and reducing unnecessary heat, and it has proven to be a successful approach.

Alternatives:

Pros

Excellent performance with PCIe Gen. 4 and Gen. 5

Helpful Samsung Magician software with lots of useful settings and features

Run cool, 5-year warranty

Cons

Only two-lane bandwidth with PCIe 5.0


3. Micron Crucial T710 (PCIe Gen 5×4)

Micron Crucial T710Micron Crucial T710
Best NVMe SSDs: The Crucial T710 is Micron’s third high-performance drive in its Crucial T series.

The Crucial T710 is Micron’s third attempt at a high-performance PCIe Gen 5 drive with an effort to reduce the excessive heat exhibited in previous models. And it was a success. The drive delivers top performance while remaining relatively cool to the touch, similar to the case of the Sandisk WD Black SN8100 below.

Similar alternatives from Micron:

Pros

Top PCIe Gen 5 performance with a reasonable level of heat

Helpful Storage Executive dashboard software, hardware encryption support

Available in standard and heatsink versions; 5-year warranty


4. Sandisk WD Black SN8100 (PCIe Gen 5×4)

The WD Black SN8100 is the first flagship internal SSD from Sandisk after the company’s separation from Western Digital, and it’s indeed significant.

Tip

Western Digital (WD)’s decision to split off the NAND-based product to Sandisk (a light name change from “SanDisk”) as a separate company means it retains all hard drive-based products, including those with “SanDisk” in their names. Similarly, Sandisk takes over all NAND-based products (SSDs, memory cards, and so on), including those bearing the “WD” in their names.

Supporting PCIe Gen 5, the drive proved to be the fastest SSD on the market upon its release. Most importantly, it does not suffer from the heat issues often prevalent in previous Gen 5 NVMe SSDs.

Similar alternatives from WD:

Pros

Top PCIe Gen 5 performance with manageable heat levels

Helpful Dashboard software

Up to 8TB capacity; standard and heatsink options; 5-year warranty

Cons

No user-accessible features


5. Samsung SSD 9100 Pro (PCIe Gen 5×4)

The Samsung 9100 PRO is a standard 2280 NVMe SSDThe Samsung 9100 PRO is a standard 2280 NVMe SSD
Best NVMe SSDs: The Samsung SSD 9100 Pro is Samsung’s first four-lane PCIe Gen 5 SSD.

The SSD 9100 Pro is Samsung’s first four-lane PCIe Gen 5 drive. It’s designed for gamers and prosumers and has everything to justify its cost, though it wasn’t the absolute best in terms of performance.

Alternatives:

Pros

Fast and reliable PCIe Gen 5×4 performance

Helpful Samsung Magician software with lots of useful settings and features

Run cool, 5-year warranty, up to 8TB of storage space, heatsink option


Best NVMe SSDs of 2025: The performance charts

Best NVMe SSDs IOPS (Random Access) PerforamnceBest NVMe SSDs Sequential (Copy) Perforamnce
Best NVMe SSDs’s random access (left) and sequential (copy) performances.

Best NVMe SSDs: The takeaway

Over the past half-decade, the NVMe SSD has gradually become the standard for internal computer storage. It’s not impossible to buy a new computer that doesn’t use one as the primary storage unit.

While NVMe drives are not created equal, in most cases, any drive that uses PCIe Gen 4 or later will be fast enough for almost any application. That said, if you’re still using a computer with a SATA SSD (or a hard drive), it’s time to upgrade to a new computer, or at least migrate to an NVMe drive to achieve the best possible performance.

On a budget and can’t decide? I’d say get the one with the lowest cost. I’ve used all of these drives for years (and will continue to use them), and none has died on me—I consider myself a heavy user in terms of moving data around. With the endurance notion in mind, in most cases, what practically separates these storage devices in real-world consumer-grade applications is their cost.

Leave a Comment